Nigeria loses compensation bid over Glencore bribery
Nigeria’s bid to claim compensation from a British
subsidiary of mining and trading group Glencore over bribes paid to officials
at Nigeria’s state oil company was denied by a London court on Wednesday.
Lawyers representing the country told London’s Southwark
Crown Court that Nigerian officials should be permitted to address the court on
Nov. 2 and 3, when Glencore Energy is to be sentenced having pleaded guilty to
seven counts of bribery in connection with oil operations in five African
countries including Nigeria.
But Judge Peter Fraser ruled that Nigeria does not have the
right to be heard, as only the prosecution, in this case the UK Serious Fraud
Office (SFO), and the defence can make arguments at a sentencing hearing.
Nigeria said in written arguments it is “an identifiable
victim of Glencore’s admitted criminal activity”, as two of the charges to
which Glencore Energy has pleaded guilty relate to payments made to Nigerian
National Petroleum Corp. officials.
The SFO had argued that individuals or entities who are not
involved in a criminal case do not have the right to address the court at
sentencing, “even if they consider themselves to be the victims of crime”.
Alexandra Healy, representing the SFO, also said in court
filings that “there is no link between the bribes paid and any loss suffered”.
Nigeria’s lawyers said Glencore is not prepared to engage on
the issue of compensation, but Clare Montgomery, representing Glencore Energy,
told the court that her client rejected the “attack on the corporate morals of
Glencore”.
She also said the contention that Glencore is “hiding behind
the SFO to avoid paying anything to is simply untrue”.
Sam Tate, a partner at law firm RPC which represented
Nigeria, told reporters after the hearing that the ruling demonstrated the “very
urgent need to reform the rules on compensating foreign countries where we have
foreign bribery offences”.
Pressure group Spotlight on Corruption said the court’s
decision is “a powerful illustration of why the current compensation framework
simply isn’t fit for purpose”.
Comments
Post a Comment