FIAU issued fines totalling €12.4 million in 2021, notes courts overruling penalties
The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) issued fines
totalling €12.4 million in 2021, its annual report shows.
The report was published on Tuesday, with Director Kenneth
Farrugia highlighting the work done to implement the Moneyval recommendations
as well as address the three main issues highlighted in the Financial Action
Task Force (FATF) greylisting report.
The FATF had greylisted Malta in 2021 after the country
failed to achieve a satisfactory score on three key areas out of 58. These
three areas dealt with the beneficial ownership of companies and their
non-compliance as well as financial analysis when it comes to tax offences and money
laundering related offences. Malta was taken off the grey list last week.
Despite the outcome of the June 2021 FATF plenary, the FIAU
said that the year was still a successful one, since significant improvements
were made with regards to the Anti-Money Laundering framework in Malta.
Throughout 2021, the FIAU received over 7,000 suspicious
report complaints, which is an increase of over 2,000 from 2020. The annual
report also shares that the FIAU has shared 8,443 intelligence reports to both
national and international authorities, this is an 86%increase on 2020.
Another significant difference from 2020 is the fact that
the FIAU are now better equipped technology wise to improve their efficiency
when it comes to assessing Money Laundering reports, while also helping to
improve the Centralised Bank Account Register functionality.
The advancements in the FIAU did not stop there. As they
increased their staff from 98 people in 2020, the headcount increased to around
130 people currently. This was done to constantly train and prepare for the
ever-changing threat posed by money laundering, be it in intelligence,
supervision and enforcement.
“The FIAU’s commitment to continually offer guidance to
businesses and entities continued despite the pandemic.”
Although the FIAU throughout 2021 fined a total of €12.4
million, the main aim of the authority was and still is to help businesses and
entities by devising plans for them to become compliant with the standards set
by the authority.
“The FIAU is a key player in combatting crime and protecting
Malta’s financial system and reputation. A financial system free from criminal
abuse and a good reputation are critical to the country’s economy and encourage
clean foreign investment,” the document read.
Malta had entered the FATF greylist due to three failures in
the effectiveness of anti-money laundering policies, processes and laws.
This area was judged on 11 immediate outcome sections and
Malta failed to obtain a pass rate in three of these. Therefore work had to be
done by the FIAU primarily in the areas of licensing anti-money laundering
institutions, investigating money laundering offences as well as a proper
framework in the confiscation of proceeds of crime.
After a year of work, the FIAU achieved an achievable pass
in the licensing of anti-money laundering institutions while a partly achieved
pass was given to the other two criteria. This evidently was enough to get
Malta off of the greylist, the FIAU said.
The process involved an action plan provided by the FATF as
well as statistical data received by the Maltese authorities and face-to-face
meetings with the board.
Court overruling FIAU fines
The FIAU is also tasked with handing out fines to businesses
and entities that do not comply with certain guidelines of compliance as stated
by the European Union.
Throughout the previous weeks, news hit that certain
entities were not paying their full fine and taking the decisions to court,
having their fine reduced substantially.
FIAU director Kenneth Farrugia said that although the
authority fully respects the decisions of the courts, “the fines are not being
respected and the amount to be paid is similar to what the FIAU used to give
years ago before the international financial institutions warned them for being
too low.”
Farrugia went on to say that “the FIAU has a mechanism in
place which was approved by the relevant international authorities which
calculates the fines given to the entities in question. However, we still
respect the decisions of the court.”
Comments
Post a Comment