FBI documents link Saudi spy in California to 9/11 attacks
Soon after the 9/11 attacks two decades ago, the FBI quietly
launched an investigation into a seemingly obscure Saudi Arabian government
bureaucrat in Southern California.
The man claimed to be nothing more than a Saudi aviation
official who innocently happened to befriend two Islamic jihadists in the
months before they carried out the 9/11 attacks.
That story now appears to be false. The alleged aviation
official was really a Saudi spy who reported directly to a Saudi prince who
happened to be the kingdom’s influential ambassador in Washington and a close
friend of President George W. Bush and other top U.S. government
officials.
The FBI concluded five years ago that there was a
"50/50 chance" that this Saudi spy knew ahead of time that the two
Islamists he befriended were about to join the plot to hijack commercial
jetliners and crash them into buildings in what turned out to be America's
deadliest terrorist attack. But the FBI refused to go public with its findings
— until now.
The story of the spy and the ambassador-prince emerged in
recent days as the centerpiece of a startling series of revelations in a newly
declassified FBI report that could shed light on a perplexing mystery that has
long shadowed the 9/11 investigation:
While heavily redacted, the report offers the most direct
link yet between the Saudi government, its secretive royal family and the team
of 19 operatives of Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda terror network who hijacked four
jetliners on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001. The terrorists crashed two
jetliners into New York’s World Trade Center, another into the Pentagon in
Northern Virginia and a fourth, which was reportedly headed to the U.S.
Capitol, into a farm field in Pennsylvania.
Nearly 3,000 people died in that mass murder-suicide scheme.
But for two decades, a major question has shadowed the inquiry into how a band
of 19 Islamic extremists pulled it off: Did the Saudi government offer assistance
to the terrorists?
A 510-page secret FBI report, written in 2017 and
declassified last week without any fanfare by the FBI or Justice Department,
concludes that the California-based Saudi spy, Omar al Bayoumi, not only helped
several 9/11 hijackers to find housing in San Diego, but that there was a
“50/50 chance” he “had advanced knowledge” of their deadly plans.
For years, top FBI leaders and Justice Department officials
kept this potentially explosive information secret, refusing to tell
Congressional investigators, the 9/11 Commission and the more than 10,000
American citizens who had signed on to a massive federal lawsuit that seeks to
link Saudi officials to 9/11.
The findings in the FBI report are coming to light just as
the Biden administration is reportedly reaching out to several oil producing
nations — including Saudi Arabia — to increase production and help curtail
rising gas prices across the United States. Whether the FBI’s report will impact
negotiations with Saudi oil officials remains to be seen. But for decades,
critics have pointed to Saudi Arabia’s oil reserves and their importance to the
economies of many western nations as a reason the U.S. has not pushed harder
for more information on alleged Saudi links to 9/11 and other Islamist-based
terrorist attacks.
Before the 9/11 attacks, the FBI report says, Bayoumi was on
the payroll of Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan Al Saud, the kingdom’s
influential U.S. ambassador who was so close to the Bush administration and
visited the White House so often that he was nicknamed “Bandar Bush.”
The FBI concluded that Bayoumi regularly passed intelligence
findings to Bandar. But the report does not say whether Bayoumi told Bandar
that he had met with two members of Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaeda terror network
who had flown to California in late 2000 to begin preparations for attacks on
Sept. 11, 2001.
Bayoumi helped the two find an apartment in San Diego. He
also introduced them to several members of a Saudi-financed mosque in Los
Angeles.
The two al-Qaeda operatives later made their way to northern
New Jersey, where they met with other 9/11 conspirators, rented cars, opened
bank accounts and postal boxes, exercised at a local gym and hung out at Macy's
and other stores at the Willowbrook Mall in Wayne.
The FBI report does not say whether Bayoumi knew they left
California — or, if he did, whether he offered them advice on how to travel to
New Jersey. Nor does the report say whether Bayoumi ever told Prince Bandar
whether he knew about the 9/11 attacks before they took place.
Compiled after years of outspoken concerns and criticism
from 9/11 victims about a possible Saudi connection to the plot, the report and
its findings were kept secret by FBI and Justice Department officials until
late last week. The report was released as part of an ongoing executive order
by President Joe Biden last September to declassify the FBI’s trove of 9/11
investigative files.
In the days leading up to the 20th anniversary of the 9/11
attacks last September, Biden had been under intense pressure by 9/11 victims
and their relatives, along with several key members of Congress, to release the
FBI’s secret investigative files. Some victims and relatives even threatened to
stage protests or boycotts at 9/11 anniversary ceremonies if Biden showed up
without ordering the FBI to open its files.
Former FDNY Chief John Dunne was one of the first to
formally propose that Mychal Judge be named a saint of the Catholic Church.
Judge, the FDNY fire chaplain, was killed in the 9/11 attacks. His grave in
Totowa has become an unofficial shrine. Dunne visited the grave for the first
time with Father Chris Keenan who replaced Judge as the FDNY Chaplain and was a
friend and colleague of Judge. They both visited the gravesite in Totowa, NJ on
August 24, 2021.
Since Biden’s executive order, the FBI has declassified a
steady trickle of files. But few of the documents offered much insight into the
long-rumored Saudi link to the 9/11 plot — until last week.
Clear evidence of a conspiracy between bin Laden’s jihadists
and Saudi officials has long been scarce. These latest revelations could change
that, advocates say. And, if nothing else, this latest report offers one of the
most startling glimpses yet into the shadow world of spies and terrorists --
and Saudi royalty.
“It’s exactly what we’ve been saying,” said James Kreindler,
one of the lead attorneys in a lawsuit by more than 10,000 9/11 victims and
relatives against the Saudi government. “Saudi government officials at a high
level were integral to the 9/11 attacks.”
The Saudi Arabian embassy in Washington — and their American
attorneys in the lawsuit — did not respond to requests for comment. The White
House did not respond either. The FBI’s media office in Washington said in an
email: “We have no comment on the documents.”
Prince Bander, 73 who is now retired after moving from his
U.S. ambassadorship to the head of the Saudi intelligence service and the Saudi
National Security Council, and Bayoumi, 63, both live in Saudi Arabia. They
could not be reached for comment.
The revelations about Bandar and Bayoumi drew an angry
response, not just from 9/11 victims and their relatives, but from a former FBI
agent who tried to sound an alarm during the summer of 2001 after he found
evidence that al-Qaeda operatives had secretly entered the United States.
“This latest report just shows what we have known all along,
but disgustingly has taken 20 years to finally be disclosed,” said Mark
Rossini, an FBI counter-terror expert assigned in 2001 to the CIA’s Alec
Station team, which was tracking several al-Qaeda operatives but deliberately
did not alert the FBI when a terrorist team entered the U.S.
Rossini, who was reached at his home in Spain where he has
lived since leaving the FBI in 2008 after pleading guilty to illegally
accessing secret files on a case unrelated to 9/11, claims he was ordered by
CIA officials and threatened with federal charges if he bucked orders and told
the FBI about the presence of al-Qaeda terrorists on U.S. soil.
Neither the CIA nor the FBI has ever explained why they did
not cooperate on what now seems to be such a basic piece of an important counter-terror
investigation — and, therefore, may have prevented the 9/11 attacks.
Brett Eagleson of Middletown, Connecticut, who lost his
father in the collapse of the Trade Center's twin towers in lower Manhattan,
said the new evidence is a major step forward in the long legal and public
relations battle to not only draw attention to Saudi Arabia’s possible links to
9/11 but hold the kingdom’s royal family and other officials accountable.
“For 20 years we’ve seen a helluva lot of smoke,” said
Eagleson, who has emerged as one of the most outspoken critics of Saudi Arabia
among the 9/11 victims and relatives in their lawsuit against the kingdom. “I
think we’ve just found the fire.”
Names of sources and other identifying details in the FBI
report are blacked out. Many of the 510 pages consist mostly of lines drawn
through entire sentences and even paragraphs. But enough information remains to
outline the seemingly strange connection between the spy (Bayoumi), the prince
(Bandar) and two rag-tag Saudi-born members of al-Qaeda’s terrorist network,
Khalid al Mihdhar and Nawaf al Hazmi.
Mihdhar and Hazmi were well known al-Qaeda operatives long
before they joined the team of 19 hijackers who carried out the 9/11 plot. In
late 2000, the CIA tracked Mihdhar and Hazmi from the Middle East to an
apartment in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia where they met with other members of bin
Laden’s network.
What the CIA did not know at the time was that the initial
plans were hatched in that meeting to hijack commercial jetliners in America
and crash them into buildings — the essential ingredients of the massive attack
on Sept. 11, 2001 that caught America by surprise and transformed U.S. foreign
policy.
After leaving the Kuala Lumpur apartment gathering, Mihdhar
and Hazmi flew to Bangkok, Thailand. With U.S. travel visas in hand, both
caught a flight to Los Angeles — not knowing that CIA agents were tailing them.
After Mihdhar and Hazmi landed in Los Angeles, they were soon
met by Bayoumi, who helped them find an apartment and introduced them to a
handful of Saudis also living in Southern California.
The CIA had no legal authority to continue tracking the two
terrorists inside the United States. By law, the CIA is strictly confined to
overseas spy operations. Critics have long claimed the CIA should have called
in the FBI and its domestic counter-terror squads. But the CIA remained silent
and has never explained why it did not immediately summon the FBI.
During the summer of 2001, Mihdhar and Hazmi moved to
northern New Jersey, settling into the Congress Inn motel on Route 46 in South
Hackensack and other area motels and apartments. From there, they met with
other 9/11 hijackers, including the ringleader, Mohamed Atta, who lived for
various periods at motels in Wayne, New Jersey.
A few weeks before the 9/11 attacks, the CIA finally told
the FBI that al-Qaeda operatives were on the loose inside America. By then, it
was too late to stop them, however. Mihdhar and Hazmi had disappeared with
other members of the 9/11 plot.
After the 9/11 attacks, FBI investigators focused attention
on Bayoumi and other Saudis in Southern California. But none was ever arrested.
Bayoumi left the United States and returned to Saudi Arabia
not long after the 9/11 attacks. While in America, he was described in the FBI
report as a “co-optee of the Saudi General Intelligence Presidency” who was
paid an undisclosed “monthly stipend” by Prince Bandar. The FBI report,
however, does not say whether Bayoumi ever spoke directly with Prince Bandar or
communicated by email.
But the report also offers this glimpse on Bayoumi’s role as
a spy and his connection to Prince Bandar: “The information AlBayoumi (sic)
obtained on persons of interest in the Saudi community in Los Angeles and San
Diego and other issues, which met certain GIP intelligence requirements, would
be forwarded to Bandar. Bander would then inform GIP of items of interest to
the GIP for further investigation/vetting or follow up.”
The 9/11 Commission investigated Bayoumi’s links to Mihdhar
and Hazmi before releasing its best-selling report 2004. But neither Saudi
officials nor the FBI and the CIA ever spelled out to Commission investigators
the extent of Bayoumi’s work as a spy or his connection to Prince Bandar.
Reached this week, the Commission’s chairman, Tom Kean, the
former New Jersey governor, said his investigators never learned that Bayoumi
was a spy.
“If that’s true I’d be upset by it,” Kean said in a
telephone interview, adding, “The FBI said it wasn’t withholding anything and
we believed them.”
But Kean also cautioned against jumping to conclusions about
the extent of Saudi involvement in the 9/11 plot.
“I think you have to take a look at the evidence,” he said.
The FBI report also does not explain when it formally
concluded that Bayoumi was, in fact, a spy. In the years after the 9/11
attacks, a number of media reports speculated that Bayoumi might have worked
for the Saudi intelligence service. But there was no formal declaration of
Bayoumi’s role until now.
“This is scary,” said Jerry S. Goldman, a New York-based
attorney who represents 500 victims in the federal lawsuit against Saudi
Arabia. “According to the allegation in the FBI report, the Saudi ambassador is
dealing with a guy who dealt with terrorists?”
Tim Frolich, who grew up in Little Falls, New Jersey, and
escaped from the 80th floor of the South Tower of the World Trade Center after
it was struck by a hijacked jetliner, said the latest revelations confirmed
long suspicions about Saudi links to terrorism. But Frolich, who worked as an
accountant for Fuji Bank in the South Tower, also harshly criticized the FBI
for withholding the details about Bayoumi for so many years.
“This information obviously should have been out to the
family members and to the American public long before now,” said Frolich who
lives in Brooklyn. “Certainly the FBI knew a whole lot more than what they
said.
Sharon Premoli, who moved to Vermont from her home in Jersey
City after escaping from the 80th floor of the North Tower where she worked as
a vice president for a financial marketing firm, said she has long suspected
that the FBI knew much more than it was telling about the Saudi links to the
9/11 attacks.
“Knowing what we already know,” she said, “how is it
possible that we continue to nurture this relationship with Saudi Arabia?”
As for the FBI and its decision to hold back for years what
it knew about the spy and the prince and the terrorists, Premoli said: “We feel
abandoned.”
Comments
Post a Comment