Saipem Fined $218MM In Alleged Corruption Case, Plans Appeal
Saipem has received a hefty fine under a first-degree
decision by the Tribunal of Algiers over alleged corruption in the 2008 tender
for the GNL3 Arzew deal.
Saipem said that it plans to appeal against the decision but
has booked a $218 million amount for the fiscal year 2021. Payment has been
suspended, pending appeal.
The ruling piles pressure on the company that expects to
report a 2021 loss of over one-third of the company’s equity. This was followed
by discussions with shareholders and creditors to devise a funding package.
It has also undergone some personnel restructuring as
Allessandro Puliti joined Saipem from Eni as general manager, while Paolo
Calcagnini from CDP was named the lead of a new unit set to strengthen the
financial planning and control. The oil and gas company Eni and the state
lender CDP are major shareholders in the company.
As for the new ruling by the Tribunal of Algiers, Saipem
said on Tuesday it has been charged of allegedly “having obtained a contract,
with a price higher than the expected value, concluded with a state-owned
commercial and industrial company, benefitting of the influence of
representatives of that company.”
The company added that it was also accused of “false custom
declarations”. In 2020, the Italian judiciary authority had fully acquitted the
company.
In addition to the fine, the Tribunal of Algiers also
sentenced two former employees of Saipem Group – the head of the project GNL3
Arzew and an Algerian former employee – to five and six years of imprisonment,
respectively. Another employee of the Saipem Group has been acquitted of all
charges.
The company is yet to find the reasoning for the ruling as
the tribunal has not made it available.
The contract in question is the one awarded to a
Saipem/Snamprogetti, in a joint venture with Chiyoda, by Sonatrach in 2008 for
the engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) of a single-train gas
liquefaction facility with a capacity of 4.7 million tons of LNG per annum. At
the time, the deal had been valued at $3.18 billion.
Comments
Post a Comment