James Velissaris has been charged with wire fraud
The founder and manager of a $1.7 billion mutual fund that
collapsed last year has been charged by federal prosecutors with securities
fraud and obstruction of justice for allegedly inflating fund asset values to
keep investor money flowing, then falsifying records to conceal the
improprieties.
The Infinity Q Diversified Alpha Fund halted investor
redemptions in February 2021, roughly seven years after it was co-founded by
James Velissaris, 37, its chief investment officer. A government inquiry began,
Velissaris stepped down and the mutual fund and a parallel hedge fund he
oversaw began liquidating.
It was a rare example of a big mutual fund failure amid a
roaring bull market. And the collapse ensnared billionaire investor David
Bonderman, co-founder of TPG, a huge private-equity firm that went public this
year. The Bonderman Family was a major investor in Infinity Q Capital
Management, the investment company overseen by Velissaris, regulatory documents
show. Velissaris had worked for the Bonderman family before he co-founded
Infinity Q Capital Management.
Prosecutors said Velissaris inflated the value of the funds’
holdings by $1 billion and manipulated the results for at least four years to
mask poor performance. At certain times during 2020 when the pandemic was
roiling the financial markets, the funds’ real values were half what investors
were told they were, prosecutors said. Certain positions held by the mutual
fund “were reported at mathematically impossible valuations,” according to a
civil complaint filed against Velissaris on Thursday by the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
In addition to securities fraud and obstruction of justice,
Velissaris has been charged with wire fraud and lying to auditors. Each charge
carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.
The SEC also accused Velissaris of pocketing $27 million in
management fees generated by his improper valuation of the funds’ holdings. The
SEC said its investigation into the debacle is continuing.
Mark Schonfeld, a lawyer at Gibson Dunn who represents Velissaris,
provided this statement: “James managed investments at Infinity Q with the
highest integrity in accordance with all applicable principles. We look forward
to vindicating James, who has been scapegoated by others who will have to
answer in court for their own compliance failures and the losses incurred by
their irresponsible liquidation of the portfolio.”
A spokesman for Infinity Q Capital Management declined to
comment.
The funds overseen by Velissaris were intended to generate
returns that did not move in tandem with the overall stock and bond markets.
Many of their holdings involved bets on exotic investments known as
derivatives, because they are derived from other securities. The funds claimed
annual returns of approximately 9.5 percent before they folded.
The Bonderman ties were a selling point for Infinity Q; a
presentation from the fund boasted that its investors would gain access to the
same “alternative investment strategies originally created” for the prosperous
family. Last year, an Infinity Q Capital Management spokesman said the
Bonderman family was a passive investor in the firm and had no control over its
investments. The family lost “a substantial amount” in the collapse, the
spokesman said. TPG, the private-equity firm cofounded by David Bonderman, did
not respond to a request for comment from Bonderman on the prosecutors’
charges.
Prosecutors said the mispricing of assets took place from at
least 2017 into 2021. Around March 2020, with the funds in a tailspin,
Velissaris sought a $100 million loan from the owners of Infinity Q Capital
Management, the SEC said. The loan was not made.
Prosecutors’ allegations of mispriced assets in the Infinity
Q portfolios echo previous problems at the mutual fund. In 2016, the fund was
late in filing a regulatory report because an independent pricing service had
been unable to “support” some of its valuations. After that incident, the
fund’s trustees, charged with overseeing it for investors, noted they had
“worked closely” with Infinity Q Capital Management “to ensure that the
appropriate source documentation for its valuation determinations are
maintained, and the adviser’s trade allocation oversight was enhanced to better
identify any errors or misallocations.”
Allegations that Velissaris manipulated returns and asset
values for four years after that incident indicate the fund’s trustees were
providing inadequate oversight, said Marshall Glickman, an aggrieved investor
in the Infinity Q fund. “Why was Velissaris in a position to misprice the
assets for four years?” he asked.
Also disturbing, Glickman said, is the amount of investor
money currently being held back by the fund trustees to cover litigation and
other expenses incurred by the fund. Last year, the trustees set aside $750
million, saying the largest component was for possible liability in connection
with litigation filed against the Infinity Q fund. The set-aside is necessary,
the trustees said, because insurance held to cover lawsuit costs may be
insufficient, and it does not cover certain expenses, including those
associated with the liquidation and government investigations.
As a result of this set-aside, Glickman said he has received
only 30 percent of his investment back.
Fund investors harmed in the alleged fraud are also paying
out approximately $900,000 a month in expenses, records show. Between June 2021
and February, those expenses totaled $7.24 million. “This could drag on for a
long time,” Glickman said. “If this case takes three years, that’s $36 million
gone right there.”
Glickman said he believes the SEC should have appointed an
independent group to manage the fund’s liquidation and disbursements, instead
of allowing the trustees who were on hand during the alleged fraud to oversee
it.
An email to the fund’s trustees was not returned. Late last
year, they approved the creation of a special committee consisting of two new
trustees to investigate and pursue potential claims on behalf of the fund and
its investors.
Comments
Post a Comment