Enabling sexual harassment: Citroen accused over ‘creepy’ advert
Car manufacturer Citroen has sparked uproar for an advert
featuring acclaimed Egyptian pop star Amr Diab that people claims promotes
sexual harassment in a country where attacks on women are notoriously rife.
The 12-second advert which was released earlier this month
features Diab, a new brand ambassador nearly hitting a woman with his car as
she crosses the road. Diab then uses a new feature of the vehicle - a camera on
the rearview mirror - to take a photograph of the woman apparently without her
consent that he downloads to his phone.
The slogan then reads “Snap every beautiful moment”. In the
full clip, they are later seen driving together.
Twitter users slammed the advert for normalising harassment
in a country where a 2013 United Nations report found that a staggering 99.3
per cent of women in Egypt had experienced some form of sexual harassment.
Many dubbed it “the creepiest ad ever” with others saying it was “gross” and
“shockingly misguided”.
“Taking a picture of a woman without her consent is creepy.
You’re enabling sexual harassment,” wrote Reem Abdellatif, an American Egyptian
writer on Twitter.
“Sexual harassment and assault are pandemics stalking the
Middle East, aided by fear and the impunity granted to perpetrators. Yet
somehow Citroen and Amr Diab thought an
ad enabling the crime would be a good idea,” she added.
Sexual harassment and gender-based violence have long been
rife in Egypt where rights groups say perpetrators have enjoyed virtual
impunity for the attacks.
In July the Egyptian parliament did approve harsher
penalties for sexual harassment and related crimes and upgraded them to felony
offences, aiming to curb sex-related assaults.
But campaigners say the problem remains as a deep-rooted
bias in Egypt places the blame on women for their “provocative” behaviour
rather than the male perpetrators.
Public prosecutors controversially in May shelved a case over a woman’s allegation
that she was gang-raped at a luxury hotel in Cairo in 2014 because of
"insufficient evidence" against the defendants.
Comments
Post a Comment