Robert Brockman Tax Evasion Case
More than 20 years ago, a group of former salesmen for Houston software entrepreneur Robert Brockman sued their old boss, claiming in court that he had deprived them of commissions by directing a portion of customer payments to a Cayman Islands entity.
Mr. Brockman twice appealed to the Texas Supreme Court as he
tried to avoid answering detailed questions about the offshore entity, and he
settled the case in 2001 under confidential terms.
Although the salesmen didn’t realize it at the time, they
had stumbled onto early signs of what the government later called the largest
criminal case ever brought against a person accused of evading U.S. taxes.
Federal prosecutors in October charged Mr. Brockman with using a web of
offshore entities to conceal about $2 billion in income from the Internal
Revenue Service.
Mr. Brockman has pleaded not guilty to 39 criminal counts,
including tax evasion, wire fraud, money laundering and evidence destruction.
He and his attorneys didn’t respond to requests for comment.
Prosecutors allege the bulk of the tax evasion stemmed from
profits Mr. Brockman made from investments with Vista Equity Partners, a
private-equity firm he helped launch in 2000 and which now manages $73 billion
in funds dedicated to software investments.
Vista founder Robert Smith, the wealthiest Black person in
America, settled his own tax-evasion case with the government, which was made
public on the day of Mr. Brockman’s indictment. Mr. Smith has agreed to testify
against his former mentor, one of at least two Brockman confidants to turn on
him.
Some of the money in the criminal case against Mr. Brockman
originated with the same Cayman Islands entity that the salesmen complained
about years earlier, according to an IRS affidavit unsealed in December. The
link between the two cases hasn’t been previously reported.
The record-setting case pits Mr. Brockman, a billionaire
with a reputation as a relentless litigant, against the immense resources of
the federal government. Legal specialists say the government appears to have
strong evidence, but federal prosecutors may face challenges trying the case
because of the complexity of tax laws governing offshore trusts.
In another potential hurdle for the government, the
79-year-old Mr. Brockman claims in court documents he can’t be tried because he
is suffering from dementia and is unable to assist in his own defense.
Prosecutors said in court filings that he could be faking a mental decline. A
hearing on his competency is scheduled for June, and if the court sides with
Mr. Brockman, the charges could be dropped or deferred.
Despite his wealth, Mr. Brockman was virtually unknown
outside of a small circle in Houston and the automotive industry until his
indictment was announced in the fall.
Court documents and interviews with his former employees,
business associates and his younger brother portray him as a brilliant,
sometimes penny-pinching executive with an antigovernment streak that led him
to regard the IRS as a corrupt organization unfairly targeting taxpayers.
Mr. Brockman bought used furniture for company offices,
rarely gave raises and forbade employees from smoking to save money on health
insurance, according to former employees and associates. He stayed at budget
hotels and ate frozen dinners in his room during monthly visits to one of his
company’s offices near Dayton, Ohio, a former vice president at his software
firm recalled.
Most of the wealth he gathered over the years is held in a
Bermuda trust that owns, among other things, nearly all of his software
company. The firm, Reynolds & Reynolds Co., provides software to auto
dealerships, and it had annual revenue of about $1.4 billion, according to a
now-defunct Brockman charity website. Mr. Brockman was chief executive of Reynolds
& Reynolds until the indictment.
“The allegations made by the Department of Justice focus on
activities Robert Brockman engaged in outside of his professional
responsibilities with Reynolds & Reynolds,” a company spokeswoman said in a
statement. “Throughout numerous court filings and legal proceedings, the
Company has never been alleged to have engaged in any wrongdoing in any way.”
The Bermuda trust has assets of at least $7.7 billion,
including $1.4 billion in Swiss bank accounts, according to a confidential
affidavit from Mr. Brockman’s wife that was filed with a Bermuda court and
reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. A lawyer for a former trustee suggested in
a recent Bermuda court hearing the trust’s total value could be as high as $10
billion.
That level of wealth would rank Mr. Brockman around 50th on
the most recent Forbes 400 list of U.S. billionaires, well ahead of Twitter
Inc. CEO Jack Dorsey and Fidelity Investments magnate Edward Johnson III. Mr.
Brockman never appears on the list.
Among the assets Mr. Brockman has amassed: a Bombardier
private jet, a 209-foot yacht, a 17,000-square-foot residence in Houston and a
5,800-square-foot cabin in Aspen, Colo., according to public records and court
documents filed by prosecutors.
The origin of his fortune dates back five decades, when Mr.
Brockman founded a company that became a pioneer in developing software that
helps automobile dealers manage nearly every aspect of their businesses,
including inventory, pricing, promotion and credit reports.
He was among the first software executives to see the value
of recurring revenue, locking customers into long-term contracts for a product
that was essential to conducting business and difficult to substitute, former
executives and customers said.
Over the years, Reynolds & Reynolds has been in
litigation with numerous car dealers, some of whom alleged they were
overcharged for mandatory upgrades, court documents show. The company denied
the allegations and often won the cases.
Reynolds & Reynolds and its main competitor, CDK Global
Inc., are the subjects of an antitrust probe by the Federal Trade Commission,
according to a CDK securities filing. Reynolds & Reynolds declined to
comment about the antitrust probe or past litigation. CDK didn’t respond to a
request for comment.
Mr. Brockman and his younger brother, Thomas David Brockman,
were raised in St. Petersburg, Fla. Their father, Alfred Eugene Brockman, was a
gas-station owner, and their mother, Pearl, a physiotherapist, according to
1940 census records.
Dave Brockman recalled lean years growing up and said his
brother “decided he didn’t love that and went out to make something of
himself.”
Robert Brockman attended Centre College, a selective
liberal-arts college in Kentucky, and paid his way partly by delivering
laundry, his brother said. He married at age 18, according to records in Boyle
County, Ky., and later divorced.
Mr. Brockman graduated from the University of Florida and
after working at Ford Motor Co. shifted to International Business Machines
Corp. , where he became a top salesman. He married his current wife, Dorothy,
in 1968.
The couple lived in Houston, where Mr. Brockman began
teaching himself computer programming and started his software company,
initially known as Universal Computer Systems Inc.
In building UCS, Mr. Brockman was particular about new
hires, requiring that all job applicants take a test designed to determine
their intelligence and suitability for a given role. Vista’s own
employee-testing regimen is based on that.
After being hired, staffers had to account for every call at
the office, and executives each week posted the names of those who made the
most personal calls. Employees had to use a keypad to open doors around the
building so managers could trace their movements.
Mr. Brockman would lead executives on dove-hunting trips to
a ranch in Mexico. He kept a stash of guns at the company’s Houston
headquarters and in the trunks of the fleet of Mercedes sedans parked in the
garage at his Houston home, former employees and visitors recall.
Robert Brockman and Dorothy Brockman during a Universal
Computer Systems trip to Cancún in January 1995. The photo was included in an
album distributed to employees who also attended.
Mr. Brockman’s yearlong sales training program was
effective, former employees said. Alumni graduated to high-level sales roles at
such companies as Microsoft Corp. and Oracle Corp.
He liked to keep employees on edge, recalled a former
executive, Bobby Tyson, who said Mr. Brockman once asked him “when was the last
time you shot somebody between the eyes.” The phrase, Mr. Tyson learned, meant
to fire an employee at random. “Everybody understands they could be next,” he
recalled his boss saying.
Mr. Tyson, who described Mr. Brockman as a genius whom he
still admires, said he once reluctantly carried out such a firing on orders
from his boss.
Later, Mr. Tyson sued Mr. Brockman for unpaid compensation.
He prevailed after a six-year court battle, which ended after Mr. Brockman’s
appeal was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court. Mr. Tyson said he ended up
collecting about $2.5 million.
Mr. Brockman’s use of offshore entities started in 1981.
That year, he and his late father flew to Bermuda to establish what became the
A. Eugene Brockman Charitable Trust, Dave Brockman said.
The trust has given away more than $100 million to charities
since 2004, court records show. It also has six human beneficiaries, according
to Bermuda court documents: Mr. Brockman, his wife, their son Robert Brockman
II and a grandchild, along with Dave Brockman and his wife.
Dave Brockman, who once worked for UCS, said he hadn’t had
much contact with his brother for close to 20 years. He said the two had a
falling out after Robert denied him a promotion he felt he deserved, and he
quit.
He doesn’t believe his brother did anything illegal, he
said, but doesn’t want any money connected to a criminal case. If offered money
from the trust, Dave Brockman said, “I would refuse it. It’s tainted money as
far as I’m concerned.”
The IRS was alerted more than 20 years ago to Mr. Brockman’s
offshore activities as a result of the litigation by his former salesmen.
In court documents, the salesmen asserted Mr. Brockman
founded the Cayman Islands entity not only to evade paying commissions but also
to avoid federal taxes. Mr. Brockman denied the allegations and said he had
sold the entity years before, while retaining preferred stock in it.
In the late 1990s, two attorneys for the salesmen met with
an IRS agent, according to people familiar with the matter. The IRS around this
time began an audit of Mr. Brockman and obtained records from Bermuda about the
trust, according to a different person familiar with the matter.
The outcome of the inquiry couldn’t be determined. But when
the Cayman Islands entity, Computer Terminals Ltd., was liquidated in the
1990s, “a substantial sum” made its way to a company in the Caribbean called
Edge Capital Investments Ltd., according to the IRS affidavit. Edge Capital was
controlled by Mr. Brockman outside of the Bermuda trust structure, prosecutors
have alleged.
Mr. Brockman allegedly used $30 million from Edge Capital to
acquire the Aspen property and a Colorado fishing retreat, part of the
purported tax evasion scheme, according to the indictment.
He also allegedly used Edge Capital to secretly purchase a
portion of his own company’s debt—an act prohibited by provisions in the loan
agreements—at a sharp discount in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the
indictment said. These allegations are potentially the most serious Mr.
Brockman faces; each of the 20 wire-fraud counts related to the debt repurchase
carries a maximum sentence of 30 years.
If Mr. Brockman’s case goes to trial, Mr. Smith, Vista’s
chief executive, is expected to testify, marking a dramatic reversal in their
lucrative relationship.
The two men met in the late 1990s, when Mr. Brockman was
considering selling his company and was introduced to Mr. Smith, then a Goldman
Sachs Group Inc. technology banker.
After Mr. Brockman decided against the sale, he presented an
idea to Mr. Smith: He would back the younger man in a private-equity fund
devoted to software—a rarity at the time. Mr. Brockman agreed to make an
initial pledge of $300 million, later increasing it to $1 billion, according to
a statement of facts Mr. Smith signed in October as part of his deal with the
government.
The arrangement carried one unusual condition. Mr. Smith had
to put a portion of his share of the fund profits into an offshore structure
similar to Mr. Brockman’s. Mr. Brockman said he didn’t want his own foreign
trust to be dragged into a U.S. court in the event of litigation against Vista,
the statement of facts said.
Robert Brockman during the Universal Computer Systems trip
to Cancún in January 1995, in a photo from an album distributed to employees
who attended.
Mr. Brockman was the only investor in Vista’s first fund,
and became a major investor in a couple of subsequent funds. Many elements of
Vista’s playbook for maximizing profits at software companies followed Mr.
Brockman’s model, according to people familiar with Vista’s early years.
In 2006, Vista helped Mr. Brockman’s Universal Computer
Systems finance the $2.8 billion acquisition of much larger Reynolds &
Reynolds, putting Mr. Brockman atop one of the two dominant players in the
auto-dealer software business.
Mr. Smith, 20 years younger than Mr. Brockman, became as
high-profile as Mr. Brockman was publicity-shy. In 2019, Mr. Smith pledged to
pay off the student loans held by the graduating class of Morehouse College, a
historically black college in Atlanta. He owns one of Manhattan’s most
expensive properties—bought for nearly $60 million in 2018—and is chairman of
Carnegie Hall. He divorced his wife and married the 2010 Playboy Playmate of
the Year.
Messrs. Smith and Brockman were both targets of the
government’s tax probe. But in October, Mr. Smith reached a nonprosecution
agreement with the government that included Mr. Smith’s admission that he
evaded paying taxes on more than $200 million in income, using an offshore
arrangement similar to one allegedly used by Mr. Brockman.
Mr. Smith agreed to pay $139 million in back taxes and
penalties and cooperate against Mr. Brockman, the government said.
Prosecutors allege Mr. Brockman set up an encrypted email
system to communicate with those involved in his offshore structure. They
referred to each other using such fishing-related code names such as “Permit,”
for Mr. Brockman, and “Steelhead,” for Mr. Smith, according to the indictment;
the IRS was “The House.”
Around 2007, Mr. Brockman hired a Bermuda attorney, Evatt
Tamine, to help manage the offshore structure. Mr. Tamine became Mr. Brockman’s
right-hand man and acted as the trustee of the main Brockman trust.
Prosecutors, citing dozens of examples, allege in the indictment that Mr.
Tamine was only a figurehead, and Mr. Brockman secretly directed every move.
A trust set up by a U.S. taxpayer’s forebears—as with the
Brockman trust—may not be subject to tax as long as it is run independently and
no money flows to the taxpayer, according to tax specialists. By claiming that
Mr. Brockman was secretly running the trust, prosecutors may be building a case
that it was either a sham or a type of controlled trust that is taxable to him,
said Matthew McKim, an offshore-tax lawyer at Loeb & Loeb LLP.
In one of Mr. Tamine’s early performance reviews, included
in a court filing, Mr. Brockman instructed him to keep records on “an encrypted
USB dongle carried in a different location in luggage when traveling” and to
run a software program called “Evidence Eliminator.”
Mr. Brockman learned of the tax investigation in June 2016,
according to prosecutors. Soon after, a former UCS executive involved in the
offshore structure, Don Jones, died. Mr. Tamine made several trips to the home
of Mr. Jones’s widow in Mississippi to destroy documents and computer drives,
according to Mr. Tamine’s account in one of his performance reviews filed with
the court.
“Those efforts meant that we could rest easily that any
attempt to search Don’s home would be fruitless,” Mr. Tamine reported to his
boss, according to the court filing.
Bermuda authorities instead raided Mr. Tamine’s home at the
request of the U.S. in September 2018. He agreed to cooperate in the case
against Mr. Brockman and gave authorities access to the encrypted email server.
Prosecutors allege that Mr. Brockman began seeking medical
evaluations of his mental acuity shortly after the raid.
A doctor in March 2019 said the executive was operating
intellectually with an IQ of 87 and exhibited poor short-term recall, according
to one of the medical reports submitted in court by Mr. Brockman’s attorneys.
Prosecutors say Mr. Brockman’s doctors have an apparent
conflict of interest because they are affiliated with Baylor College of
Medicine. The Brockman trust has donated millions of dollars to the school, and
Mr. Brockman has served as a board trustee. A Baylor spokeswoman declined to
comment.
Mr. Brockman continued to run his multibillion-dollar
software company during this period, and he gave “long and cogent answers”
during a two-day legal deposition in September 2019, prosecutors said.
Two weeks later, Mr. Brockman took a cognitive test in which
he had trouble drawing a clock face, according to court filings, resulting in a
finding of “moderate dementia.”
Comments
Post a Comment