Who’s In Charge Following Revolution in Kyrgyzstan?
Sadyr Japarov’s meteoric rise was fueled by a fortunate combination of two political assets: popular radical rhetoric, and connections with influential people. But it’s unlikely they can both be juggled for long. One of them will have to be sacrificed.
When protesters in Kyrgyzstan brought about regime change in
just a few days following elections that were clearly rigged, many saw it as a
victory for democracy. Yet what happened can hardly be described as a
democratic revolution. While uncoordinated activists and opposition figures
were trying to reach an agreement, the revolution was hijacked by seasoned
politicians from the old elite. The fastest and most determined of them turned
out to be Sadyr Japarov. In just ten days he managed to escape from prison,
become prime minister, force President Sooronbay Jeenbekov to resign, and take
his place.
Despite his current reputation as a protester against the
regime he has just toppled, Japarov is no stranger to the Kyrgyz ruling elite.
Until 2005, he was the head of the Nurneftegaz oil refinery, which was accused
of corporate tax evasion on his watch. He rode into politics atop the wave of
the first Kyrgyz revolution in 2005, which brought President Kurmanbek Bakiyev
to power.
Today, Japarov talks a lot about patriotism and fighting
corruption, but his opponents insist that as an adviser responsible for
tackling graft under Bakiyev, he was in fact tasked with concealing corrupt
schemes within the president’s inner circle. Issyk-Kul Investment Bank, for
example, which was used by Bakiyev’s son for money laundering, was headed by none
other than Japarov’s sister, Raikul.
When the second Kyrgyz revolution of 2010 toppled Bakiyev,
Japarov disappeared for a couple of months, before resurfacing in the country’s
south, where together with his friend Kamchybek Tashiev, he took part in the
interethnic strife between Kyrgyz and ethnic Uzbeks there. While Japarov claims
he and Tashiev “prevented the further mutual destruction of two peoples,”
witnesses say they helped the Kyrgyz nationalists.
Japarov’s involvement in the bloody clashes secured him a
reputation as Kyrgyzstan’s chief patriot. He and Tashiev ran in the
parliamentary elections of 2010 as candidates for the Ata-Zhurt (Fatherland)
nationalist party, which swept to success.
Cementing his image as a patriot, in 2012 Japarov launched a
campaign to nationalize the country’s biggest gold mine, Kumtor, which was
being developed by the Canadians. Together with Tashiev, he led a crowd of
supporters of the nationalization plan who tried unsuccessfully to storm the
White House in Bishkek. Both men were stripped of their status as
parliamentarians as a result, and were charged with attempting to seize power
by force.
The following year, there was unrest in Japarov’s native
Issyk-Kul region over the gold mine, and a government official was taken
hostage. Japarov, who had gone abroad two days earlier, was accused of inciting
the unrest. He remained abroad and continued his political activity in exile
for the next few years. When he eventually returned in 2017, he was arrested at
the airport and sentenced to ten years in prison for his part in the unrest of
2013.
While Japarov was in prison, his son and both of his parents
died, and he tried to kill himself. This only increased his popularity and
image as a political prisoner being tormented for trying to expose the corrupt
authorities.
Polls in August this year showed him and Tashiev as among
the top four most trusted politicians (then president Jeenbekov was only in
seventh place). So Japarov and Tashiev had high expectations for the party they
had founded, Mekenchil, in this month’s parliamentary elections. But the
official results showed that the party had not gained any seats, just like eleven
other opposition parties. On the night of October 6, protests escalated into a
revolution, and an angry mob seized the parliament and presidential
administration building. Japarov was freed from prison, alongside other
political leaders, including former president Almazbek Atambayev.
The other newly released politicians rushed to rally their
supporters and forge alliances — but not Japarov. Instead, he made a speech in
front of the remaining protesters on Bishkek’s central square, to rapturous
chants of “Japarov for president!”
His Mekenchil party split away from the Atambayev-supported
opposition to put forward Japarov as prime minister. At an emergency meeting of
parliamentary deputies in a hotel surrounded by burly men, Japarov was voted in
as acting prime minister. The deputies subsequently claimed they had been
threatened, but Japarov gave press conferences insisting he had legitimately
been elected, and a crowd of his supporters helped him to take the government
building by force. Other protesters opposed his coup, but found themselves
outnumbered.
Having established himself as prime minister, Japarov didn’t
stop there. Despite the unrest, Jeenbekov had no intention of stepping down as
president until new parliamentary elections had been held. But Japarov had
other ideas, and forced him out on Oct. 15, seizing the initiative while his
supporters were still out in force on the streets. Under the constitution, the
presidential duties should have passed to the speaker of the parliament, but he
passed in favor of Japarov.
Japarov has by far the biggest social media following of any
Kyrgyz politician, but that wouldn’t have been enough on its own. He also had
the help and support of some influential people. Amid something of a
north-south divide in Kyrgyzstan, Japarov himself is from the northern
Issyk-Kul region, but he won support in the south through his involvement in
the interethnic clashes there in 2010, and thanks to his friendship with
Tashiev, who hails from the southern Jalal-Abad region.
It’s also widely believed that the Japarov-Tashiev tandem
has the support of a number of crime bosses, as well as the radical nationalist
movement Kyrk Choro (Forty Knights), several of whose members ran in the
parliamentary elections as candidates from Mekenchil. Tashiev, meanwhile, is
known to be on good terms with Raimbek Matraimov, the former deputy head of the
customs service and subject of many a corruption scandal.
Now Japarov holds the positions of both president and prime
minister, and is preparing for snap elections. There’s one hitch: the
constitution bars an acting president from running. Japarov has already
promised to carry out electoral legislation reform that will likely remove this
obstacle for him, among other changes.
To avoid losing popularity, he needs to implement his old
promises, above all to tackle corruption. He has already made a point of
arresting Matraimov, followed swiftly by Kamchybek Kolbayev, Kyrgyzstan’s most
notorious crime boss.
Many saw the arrests as being staged, and, indeed, Matraimov
was released after just a few hours. No doubt Kolbayev will soon be released
too: Japarov isn’t ready to take on either of these powerful figures just yet.
One of his first acts was an economic amnesty giving corrupt officials thirty
days to return stolen funds to the state budget without any consequences.
Together with his promises to reform the electoral system, replacing the party
list system with single-member constituencies — leaving the system more open to
corruption and convenient for local elites — this could be considered a signal
to influential groups that the new president is open to offers.
A similar signal was sent abroad. Having called for years
for the Kumtor gold mine to be nationalized, Japarov declined to do so upon
finding himself in power. His excuse that “there’s no gold left there” is
unconvincing.
Now, without alienating his own supporters, Japarov must
persuade Kyrgyzstan’s main partners—Moscow and Beijing — that they can deal
with him, despite his alarming nationalist rhetoric. Back when Bakiyev was
president, he tried to play the anti-Russian card, and it ended in disaster for
him. Meanwhile, anti-Chinese protests that have occurred, together with
vandalism and attacks on Chinese workers, have frightened China, which could
further toughen its position on collecting the debt it is owed at any time.
Japarov’s meteoric rise was fueled by a fortunate
combination of two political assets: popular radical rhetoric, and connections
with influential people. But it’s unlikely they can both be juggled for long.
One of them will have to be sacrificed.
Comments
Post a Comment