U.S. Is Tightening the Noose on Huawei
Markets reacted calmly to the Trump Administration’s latest escalation in its war on Chinese telecom giant Huawei. Maybe too calmly.
U.S. Commerce Department regulations issued Aug. 17 will in
theory prevent Huawei from buying any equipment or software containing any
U.S.-originated inputs, without a case-by-case license. That’s kind of a big
deal, you might think.
The Shenzhen-based powerhouse vies with Samsung Electronics
as a top global handset producer, and has poll position in 5G technology. It’s
a major customer for leading tech names from Qualcomm (ticker: QCOM) and Qorvo
(QRVO) to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM). Washington could crush this
thriving symbiosis if it really wanted to. China specialist Gavekal Research
labeled Commerce’s move a “death sentence for Huawei.”
Investors don’t much care so far. None of Huawei’s blue-chip
suppliers sold off much on the news. Stocks of Telefon AB L.M. Ericsson (ERIC)
and Nokia (NOK), its prime competitors to build out 5G, didn’t advance. Major
share movements were restricted to less widely held names like Taiwanese chip
maker MediaTek (2454.Taiwan), which crashed 10% on Tuesday, and rival Chinese
phone manufacturer Xiaomi (1810.Hong Kong), which jumped 6%.
Trade war fatigue is one reason for the market apathy, says
Mehdi Hosseini, an analyst at Susquehanna International Group. Commerce’s move
supersedes a regulation three months ago that turned out to be riddled with
loopholes. “The situation is so freaking chaotic that the market is saying,
‘We’re not really going to do anything,” Hosseini says.
Stock traders have grown accustomed to ignoring much worse
news over the past few months, observes Matt Gertken, geopolitical strategist
at BCA Research. “Last year this would have caused a pretty big sell-off,” he
says. “Now we’re injecting economies with so much stimulus that we’re not
feeling the pain.”
There may be plenty of pain eventually, though, from the
U.S. campaign against Huawei, and the broader tech cold war. While Trump kicked
off the hostilities, presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden will
continue them in similar vein if he wins the U.S. election, Gertken predicts.
“A technological cordon on China will involve very big costs to capital
intensive industries,” he warns.
At the company level, Washington’s tightening supply noose
creates particular dilemmas for Taiwan Semiconductor, the premier global chip
manufacturer whose stock has climbed by more than a third this year, Hosseini
says. “They are the greatest foundry, but we can’t ignore the impact of more
trouble selling to Huawei.”
A Beijing counter-attack could target one of the bull
market’s true darlings, Apple (AAPL), which gets a quarter of its revenue from
China. “If the U.S. sucker-punches Huawei, Apple would be the obvious choice
for retaliation,” Hosseini says.
Chinese leader Xi Jinping will likely hold this card back
until after the U.S. election at least, not wanting to antagonize Trump either
on his way to term two or to retirement, Gertken says. But like any war, the
tech cold war is almost certain to take unpredictable and costly turns. The
price may be worth it, but there will be a price.
Comments
Post a Comment