Half a billion into NSW Treasury from Glencore's Newcastle export coal royalties
GLENCORE'S latest Payment to Governments report says the
mining giant paid $US374 million ($542 million) in royalties last year for coal
shipped through Newcastle, as part of $US1.68 billion ($2.4billion) in
Australian taxes and $US2.9 billion ($4.2 billion) in total payments to
Australian governments.
As the table above shows, the $US1.68 billion was part of
$US4 billion in global payments, as recognised by a European Union accounting
directive used by Glencore in laying out its tax bills.
When other payments to governments are taken into account,
the overall figure swelled to $US7.7 billion.
A Glencore spokesperson said the report showed the company
paid more tax in Australia than anywhere else.
It had nine coal mining operations in NSW and six in
Queensland.
The report said Glencore had 150 operations in 35 countries,
employing about 160,000 people.
Glencore, like other multinational companies, has been
accused of artificially minimising its taxes.
The first in this series of reports, published in 2015, said
the company knew its "license to operate" depended on
"sustainability", which included "acting responsibly over our
tax affairs".
The 2019 report says: "In recent years, governments,
the media and the public at large have raised legitimate questions in connection
with the alleged diversion of business profits by multinational enterprises
into tax havens mainly in order to avoid paying local taxes."
It says Glencore did not do this, saying: "Our Group
tax policies commit us to not engineer structures or transactions that exploit
transfer pricing rules by artificially 'transferring' profit into lower tax
jurisdictions."
Given the "legitimate concern of tax administrations to
collect the full amount due to them", the report said Glencore's
"transfer pricing should be subject to careful scrutiny and even
occasional dispute".
Glencore did, however, have subsidiaries in countries that
would be "termed tax neutral or tax haven jurisdictions".
Although these subsidiaries served "a commercial or
administrative purpose" and had "no tax motivation", a
continuing review of its structure had "removed many many tax haven
incorporated companies, or established their tax residence in Switzerland, the
UK or another non-tax haven jurisdiction".
A closely watched "transfer pricing" case resumes
in the Full Federal Court in August when the Australian Taxation Office appeals
a Glencore victory late in the Federal Court in October 2019 over taxes paid on
the sales of copper concentrate in 2007, 2008 and 2009.
The tax office is reportedly seeking $178 million.
Comments
Post a Comment