Credit Suisse Wins $3.5 Mln from U.S. Brokers Who Claimed Hiring Fraud
Three advisors who claimed Credit Suisse hired them in May
2015 without disclosing plans to imminently close its U.S. brokerage business
lost their attempt to collect more than $15 million in damages, and have
instead been ordered to pay the bank $3.5 million of promissory note balances.
In a Finra arbitration claim, Pouya Lavian, Scott Pedvis and
Robert Decker had asserted that they were “fraudulently induced” to join Credit
Suisse Securities (USA) five months before it announced plans to shutter its
upscale brokerage unit and shuttle its 336 high-net-worth brokers to Wells
Fargo Advisors.
The brokers alleged that Credit Suisse’s decision to close
so soon after their arrival from JPMorgan Chase’s private bank cost them at
least $15.2 million in losses (they initially sought $23.8 million) because of
disruptions to their careers, client relationships and income, according to an
award document published on Monday by a Finra arbitration panel in New York.
(The brokers had produced $13.3 million on $2.2 billion of client assets at
JPMorgan, according to a temporary restraining order request the New York bank
had filed when they joined Credit Suisse.)
The arbitrators ordered each of the brokers to pay more than
$1 million of principal and interest due on promissory notes that extended
through April 30, 2020, according to Monday’s award. The interest, which
continues to accumulate until the award is paid, was set at a default rate of
more than 5%, according to a Credit Suisse official.
The arbitrators denied the brokers’ request for punitive
damages and both sides’ requests for attorneys’ fees—which are customarily
awarded to banks in contractual note cases, according to employment lawyer
Kevin Hoffman, who initially represented the brokers—but ordered Lavian, Pedvis
and Decker to jointly pay almost $98,000 of additional costs associated with
the bank’s promissory note claims. The arbitration proceeded over almost four
years.
As is customary, the arbitrators did not explain their
decision.
Neither the brokers nor their lawyers at the Coral Gables,
Fla. law firm of Rasco Klock Perez & Nieto
responded to requests for comment on the decision. A Credit Suisse
spokesman said he could not immediately comment.
The decision follows about seven arbitration decisions in
favor of former Credit Suisse brokers who left for firms other than Wells and
alleged that they were owed deferred compensation that should have immediately
vested because they were terminated involuntarily without cause. The Swiss
bank, which has sought to vacate several multi-million-dollar awards, has
argued that most of the brokers were unjustly seeking “double compensation” in
violation of industry standards because their new employers compensated them
for money left behind.
A New York appellate court in late April affirmed the bulk
of a lower court’s confirmation of a $976,000 deferred compensation arbitration
award to Nicholas Finn, a former Credit Suisse broker who joined UBS. (Credit
Suisse last year won $9 million in a raiding suit in which it claimed UBS
interfered with its Wells Fargo broker-transfer arrangement.)
Credit Suisse plans to further appeal the Finn decision, a
company lawyer said.
Lavian, Pedvis and Decker, who now work at Wells Fargo
Advisors, were not at Credit Suisse long enough to accumulate significant
deferred compensation (though they sought
“repayment of any…deferred compensation”), and the fraudulent inducement
claim was at the core of their argument, according to several lawyers familiar
with the cases.
Credit Suisse has not won a deferred comp arbitration case,
according to Finra’s database, but bank officials have said that dozens of
former advisors have dropped claims. Plaintiffs’ lawyers have said several of
their clients dropped claims because of the expense of the process while others
received monetary settlements.
The Swiss bank also has won at least four promissory-note
balance claims.
Comments
Post a Comment