Canadian court set to rule today on Huawei CFO's case
Huawei Technologies' chief financial officer, who is
fighting extradition to the US, gets her first shot at release today in a case
that has triggered an unprecedented diplomatic tussle between the US, China and
Canada.
The Supreme Court of British Columbia is set to release a
decision on whether Meng Wanzhou's case meets a key threshold of Canada's
extradition law. If the judge rules that it fails to meet that test, Meng could
be released from house arrest in Vancouver. If not, extradition proceedings
will continue.
Meng was arrested on a US handover request in late 2018 on a
routine stopover at Vancouver airport.
The eldest daughter of Huawei's billionaire founder Ren
Zhengfei has become the highest-profile target of a broader US effort to
contain China and its largest technology company, which the US sees as a
national security threat.
China has accused Canada of abetting "a political
persecution".
In the weeks after Meng's arrest, China jailed two Canadians
- Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig - halted billions of dollars in Canadian
imports and put two other Canadians on death row.
US President Donald Trump muddied the legal waters by
suggesting he might intervene in her case to boost a China trade deal.
China's Foreign Ministry yesterday urged Meng's release,
saying the US and Canada had abused their bilateral deal on extradition.
"Canada should correct its mistake and immediately
release Meng Wanzhou and ensure her safe return to China to avoid continuous
damage of China-Canada relations," ministry spokesman Geng Shuang said.
Meng, 48, faces tough odds: Of the 798 US extradition
requests received since 2008, Canada has refused or discharged only eight
cases, or 1 per cent.
Whichever way it goes, the ruling will further escalate the
fight between US and China, already at loggerheads over everything from the
coronavirus pandemic to the status of Taiwan and Hong Kong as well as trade and
investment.
Central to Meng's case are allegations that she committed
fraud by lying to HSBC Holdings and tricking the bank into conducting
Iran-related transactions in breach of US sanctions. Today's ruling will focus
on whether the alleged fraud would also be a crime in Canada. Her defence has
argued that the US case is, in reality, a sanctions-violations complaint framed
as fraud. Had Meng's alleged conduct taken place in Canada, the transactions by
HSBC would not violate any Canadian sanctions, they say.
The US bank and wire fraud charges carry a maximum term of
20 years in prison on conviction.
If the ruling goes against her, Meng's next court hearings
are scheduled for next month and could continue to at least the end of the
year.
Comments
Post a Comment