Glencore named in Congo child labour case targeting Big Tech
The Swiss mining giant Glencore is at the center of a new
legal case against Big Tech in the United States over the “extreme abuse” of
children mining cobalt in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Several of the fatalities and injuries highlighted in the US
class-action civil lawsuit allegedly occurred on Glencore-owned sites,
according to the testimony of plaintiffs included in court records.
Cobalt – a by-product of copper and nickel mining – is an
essential component of rechargeable lithium-ion batteries used in the
electronic devices produced by Apple, Google, Dell, Microsoft and Tesla. It is
commonly found in smartphones, laptops and electric vehicles.
The American tech companies are named as the defendants in a
civil case filed in Washington D.C. by International Rights Advocates, an
organisation dedicated to corporate accountability through litigation on behalf
of 14 Congolese families. It accuses the tech companies of “aiding and
abetting” the mines exploiting child labour to source cobalt.
“In my 35 years as a human rights lawyer, I’ve never seen
such extreme abuse of innocent children on a large scale,” said the plaintiffs’
lead counsel, Terry Collingsworth, when presenting the claim in a statement.
“This astounding cruelty and greed need to stop.”
The case marks the first time that the tech industry
confronts legal action jointly over its cobalt sourcing.
The plaintiffs' lawyer claims that Apple, Alphabet, Dell,
Microsoft, and Tesla “knew or reasonably should have known that the cobalt
supply chain ventures operated by Glencore/Umicore and Huayou Cobalt were using
forced child labour.” All five tech companies prohibit the use of child labour
in their suppliers' codes of conduct.
Asked about the case, Apple and Dell Technologies told
swissinfo.ch they were deeply committed to responsible sourcing. Apple noted it
has been mapping its cobalt supply chain to the mine level since 2016. Dell
said it was investigating the allegations and had informed the Responsible
Minerals Initiative.
Glencore is not named as a defendant in the case, the Swiss
mining and commodity trading company stressed in a statementexternal link in
response to questions raised by swissinfo.ch.
“Glencore does not purchase, process or trade any
artisanally mined copper or cobalt,” the multinational stated.
Other defendants did not respond to emailed requests for
comment.
Collingsworth and two researchers who helped build the case
call into question whether Glencore operated responsibly in the central African
nation.
They accuse the company of fuelling the artisanal mining
boom by buying raw materials from resellers who in turn buy from artisanal
miners.
The DRC produces 60% of the world’s cobalt supplies.
Surface-digging, rinsing, sorting and tunnel-digging are some of the activities
undertaken by adults and children.
The researchers on the case estimate that thousands of
children mining cobalt – including in concessions owned by Glencore – are
forced to work under hazardous conditions at risk of losing life and limb and
at the expense of education.
The risks for children in this sector have been flagged over
the years by Amnesty International, World Vision, and others.
Amnesty International saysexternal link “human rights abuses
in Congo power the global trade in cobalt.”
As young as 6-years-old
Some of the child miners, the class action lawsuits notes,
are as young as six and have been trafficked to work on the mines. Ten of the
plaintiffs in the case were severely wounded or maimed. “John Doe 3” lost his
leg at a mine operated by a subsidiary of a Chinese mining company.
Some of these accidents allegedly took place on sites owned
by Glencore.
A 16-year-old boy codenamed “James Doe 2” in the lawsuit
mined cobalt six days per week to support his family, according to the court
filing.
He was killed when a tunnel collapsed at Tilwezembe, one of
Glencore’s mining sites in southern DRC, on Jan. 14. Boys identified as “Joshua
Doe 2” and “James Doe 12” reportedly died while mining the same site.
Glencore says it had no hand in the matter, adding that the
concession has long been overrun by trespassing artisanal miners.
“Since 2011, Glencore has had no access to the concession
and does not have any operational or commercial involvement with it,” the
company said in a statement. “Glencore has repeatedly requested the DRC
government to take action to resolve the situation.”
But the plaintiffs accuse the mining giant of indirectly
sourcing minerals from those same mines. They argue that this made the company
complicit in the child labour and hazardous conditions there. The mining
company says that the claims are incorrect.
Roger-Claude Liwanga, a fellow at Harvard University and
co-researcher in the case, claims that based on his research two Congolese
mining companies tied to Glencore had made deals with local cooperatives of
artisanal miners who extract cobalt ores from Glencore-owned concessions.
“Those agreements with the cooperatives of artisanal miners
are non-compliant with the provisions of the DRC Mining Code that stipulates
that the mining concessions, which are dedicated to industrial mining, cannot
be used for artisanal mining,” he says.
The lawsuit then goes on to claim that the output of
artisanal miners at Tilwezembe was sold to Glencore by a "sham
cooperative" set up to bypass the new Congolese Mining Code. Glencore says
that allegation is also incorrect, reiterating that it does not "purchase,
process or trade in any artisanally mined copper or cobalt."
Siddharth Kara, who researched this issue in DRC, told
swissinfo.ch that based on his research it was his impression that the
Tilwezembe mining site was secured by the "military on behalf of
Glencore.” Glencore says that the allegation is incorrect.
Kara said he visited dozens of mining sites in two provinces
in the summer of 2018, but Tilwezembe was the only one he could not access due
to strict entry controls.
More than 35,000 child miners
“The problem is not limited to Tilwezembe – it is endemic
across all Glencore-owned cobalt sites that I documented,” said Kara, an
adjunct lecturer in public policy at the Harvard Kennedy School.
He estimates there are more than 35,000 children working in
the Congolese cobalt sector in conditions so shocking that they warranted
“strategic litigation”.
Collingsworth said that he was looking into suing Glencore,
but did not elaborate.
“Glencore may never admit it, but they rely on penny-wage
artisanal cobalt mining to boost their production at minimal expense,"
Kara said. "When those people are injured or killed, they claim illegal
trespass and that their sites are overrun.” Glencore says that the allegation
is incorrect.
The researcher attributes the high presence of children in
the mining sector to three reasons: Adult wages at $1-2 per day are too low to
ensure family survival so children must become breadwinners. Children begin
working in the sector after the loss of a parent due to mining activity. Rural
residents are uprooted en masse to make space for industrial mining.
Glencore – trying to do better?
By its own count, Glencore had three fatalities in its DRC
operations in 2019. The toll excludes the dozens of “trespassing” miners who
were killed when part of the open-pit mine collapsed in the Kolwezi area,
triggering a military intervention. Mining accidents in the mineral-rich
African nation often take place in remote areas and are underreported.
Glencore says it employs 15,800 people in the DRC and that
it discourages artisanal mining by supporting economic diversification
programmes for communities living near its operation. It says its local
subsidiary KCC provided educational summer camps to “help children and their
parents understand the risks associated with artisanal mining.”
None of the child laborers named in the complaint were able
to attend school, Liwanga noted. He said he had not witnessed such
community-focused efforts by Glencore during their work in DRC. Liwanga: “Most
children in Kolwezi don’t attend schools because their parents are unable to
pay the school fees for them.”
Kara was equally unimpressed. He slammed the notion of
holiday camps saying the term is “repugnant to the realities on the ground”
when what is truly needed is schools.
Glencore said earlier this month that it would join the
Responsible Sourcing Blockchain Network, an industry collaboration focusing on
the potential of blockchain technology to increase transparency along the
supply chain from mine to market.
Starting February 2020, the initial focus of Glencore’s
participation will be cobalt, the company said.



Comments
Post a Comment